0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿åâ°ú ½Ç±Ý °ü·Ã ÇǺο°ÀÇ ½Ã°¢Àû °¨º°´É·Â ÃøÁ¤µµ±¸ ¿¹ºñ¹®Ç×ÀÇ ³»¿ë Ÿ´çµµ

Content Validity of Preliminary Items for Visual Differentiation Measurement on Pressure Injury and Incontinence-associated Dermatitis

ÀçÈ°°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2023³â 26±Ç 2È£ p.109 ~ 116
KMID : 0939320230260020109
ÀÌÀ±Áø ( Lee Yun-Jin ) - 

±èÁ¤À± ( Kim Jung-Yoon ) - 
ȲÁöÇö ( Hwang Ji-Hyeon ) - 
¹Ú¿Á°æ ( Park Ok-Kyoung ) - 
ÁÖ¸íÁø ( Ju Myoung-Jean ) - 
È«Á¤Àº ( Hong Jung-Eun ) - 
¹Ú½Â¹Ì ( Park Seung-Mi ) - 

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the content validity of the preliminary items for a visual differentiation measurement on pressure injury (PI) and incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) for nurses.

Methods: This study was conducted using a convenience sampling and methodology research design. The participants were twenty three specialized wound care nurses in Korea. They were asked to response the validity regarding twenty items including wound photo and relevant information. Data were analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 28.0 with descriptive statistics.

Results: The scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) of 20 items was 0.96. All the participants agreed the photos and relevant information regarding stage I PI, stage IV PI, unstageable PI, and IAD. Agreement rate of stage II PI, deep tissue PI, blanching erythema was 91.3% and that of stage III was 82.6%.

Conclusion: The content validity of the preliminary items for a visual differentiation measurement on PI and IAD was acceptable. However, more detail description of the wound bed condition and changes over time are necessary in order to enable accurate PI and IAD assessment.
KeyWords
¿åâ, °£È£»ç, ÇǺο°, ½Å·Úµµ¿Í Ÿ´çµµ
Pressure ulcer, Nurses, Dermatitis, Validity and reliability
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸